美英等14国与欧盟重申南海仲裁裁决 中国坚称无效US, UK, and Allies Reaffirm South China Sea Ruling as China Rejects It

由美国、英国以及其他12个西方和亚洲国家于周日发表的联合声明，专门纪念了2016年7月12日海牙仲裁庭作出的裁决。该裁决是由根据《联合国海洋法公约》设立的仲裁庭作出的。这14个签署国在联合声明中重申，根据该项历史性裁决，中国在南海的扩张性海洋主张缺乏法律依据。

The joint statement, issued on Sunday by the United States, the United Kingdom, and 12 other Western and Asian nations, specifically commemorated the July 12, 2016, arbitration ruling. This landmark decision was handed down by an arbitral tribunal established in The Hague under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.

此外，这些国家明确表示拒绝在争议水域采取任何“破坏稳定”的行动，并强调此类行为直接威胁到地区的和平与稳定。通过发表这一联合声明，这14个国家旨在维护基于规则的海洋秩序，并重申国际仲裁庭裁决的权威性，他们强调该裁决对所有相关方均具有终局性和法律约束力。

In their collective message, the 14 signatory countries reasserted that China's expansive maritime claims in the South China Sea lack any legal basis under the 2016 ruling. Furthermore, the coalition of nations explicitly rejected any "destabilizing" actions in the highly contested waters, emphasizing that such activities directly threaten regional stability. By aligning their diplomatic positions, these countries aimed to uphold the rules-based maritime order and reinforce the authority of the international tribunal's decision, which they maintain is final and legally binding.

由27个成员国组成的欧盟发表了一份单独声明，以纪念2016年7月12日的南海仲裁案裁决。在这份独立声明中，欧盟重申该裁决是“和平解决争端的里程碑式决定”。通过发表这一声明，欧盟展现了其在维护国际海洋法秩序方面的外交立场，并强调了通过和平手段解决南海争议的重要性。

The 27-nation European Union issued its own separate statement to mark the anniversary of the July 12, 2016, arbitration ruling. In this independent declaration, the bloc reaffirmed the tribunal's ruling as a "landmark decision in the peaceful settlement of disputes." By issuing this statement, the European Union aligned its diplomatic stance with other international partners, asserting the importance of adhering to international law in resolving maritime conflicts.

欧盟在声明中补充指出，根据《联合国海洋法公约》设立的仲裁庭所作出的这项2016年裁决，对所有相关方而言都是终局性的，且具有法律约束力。欧盟的单独表态重申了其对基于规则的国际秩序的支持，也体现了其对南海这一关键航道和平与稳定的持续关注，该地区的安全对全球贸易至关重要。

The European Union's statement further noted that the 2016 decision, which was established under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, is final and legally binding on all parties involved. The bloc's separate message reiterated its support for a rules-based international order and peaceful conflict resolution in the strategic waterways of the South China Sea, where regional stability remains a key concern for global trade and security.

针对多国发表的联合声明以及欧盟的单独表态，中国官方于周日公开回应，重申了其在南海仲裁案上的一贯立场。北京方面明确表示，2016年海牙仲裁庭作出的裁决是“无效且无约束力”的。中国官方强调，对于该项裁决，北京“既不接受也不承认”，以此坚决回击了西方及亚洲多国对该裁决法律效力的声索。

In response to the joint statement by the 14 nations and the separate declaration by the European Union, China officially reiterated its long-standing position on Sunday regarding the South China Sea arbitration. Beijing declared that the 2016 ruling by the tribunal in The Hague remains "null and void and has no binding force." The Chinese government emphasized that it "neither accepts nor recognizes" the landmark decision, firmly rejecting the renewed international pressure.

中国政府在周日的表态中再次表明，其不会受任何基于该仲裁结果的国际主张所约束。这一回应直接针对了由美国、英国等14国以及欧盟发表的纪念声明，表明了中国在南海主权和海洋权益问题上不妥协的立场，并继续无视国际仲裁庭作出的裁决。

By repeating this stance on Sunday, China made it clear that it does not consider itself bound by the international ruling or the diplomatic assertions made by the United States, the United Kingdom, and their allies. This official response underscores Beijing's ongoing refusal to acknowledge the authority of the 2016 arbitral tribunal decision, maintaining its own claims over the contested waters regardless of the coordinated statements from Western and Asian partners.

这项历史性的南海仲裁案最初是由菲律宾于2013年正式发起的。该案的起因可以追溯到2012年，当时中国与菲律宾在南海争议水域发生了一场紧张的对峙。这场对峙最终以北京方面实际控制争议沙洲而告终，随后菲律宾决定寻求国际仲裁，以解决双方在相关海域的法律地位和主权争议。

The historic South China Sea arbitration was originally initiated by the Philippines in 2013. The origins of the legal case trace back to 2012, when a tense maritime standoff occurred between Chinese and Philippine vessels in the contested waters. This standoff ultimately concluded with Beijing effectively seizing control of a disputed shoal, prompting Manila to seek international legal recourse to address the maritime disputes.

在菲律宾于2013年启动仲裁程序后，中国政府采取了拒绝参与的立场。北京方面当时明确拒绝加入该仲裁案，并一直坚持不承认该仲裁庭的管辖权。尽管中国拒绝参与，海牙仲裁庭依然继续审理了此案，并最终于2016年7月12日作出了裁决，从而形成了如今多国重申并要求各方遵守的国际法律文件。

Following the initiation of the arbitration process by the Philippines in 2013, China adopted a non-participation stance. Beijing officially refused to join the arbitration proceedings and consistently rejected the tribunal's jurisdiction over the matter. Despite China's refusal to participate, the tribunal established in The Hague under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea proceeded with the case, culminating in the landmark July 12, 2016, ruling.