特朗普宣布禁止CNN等三家媒体进入白宫Trump Announces Ban on CNN, Politico, and MS NOW from White House

美国总统特朗普在Truth Social发文称，新闻机构在报道美国总统、特朗普政府或美国时，不应持续撰写或报道虚构内容与谎言。他在帖子中点名CNN、MS NOW与Politico，并补充称其他报道虚假新闻的机构也将随后受到限制，但他当时并未列举具体的涉事报道。

In a post on Truth Social, US President Donald Trump wrote that news organizations should not be permitted to constantly report fiction and lies when covering the presidency, his administration, or the nation. Singling out CNN, MS NOW, and Politico, he asserted that other outlets would follow, though his post did not identify any specific news stories that prompted the restriction.

随后在椭圆形办公室接受记者提问时，特朗普称这一决定是过去几年媒体累积报道的结果，坚称限制行动是因为这些机构报道虚假新闻，并否认自己试图威吓媒体。当被追问其他可能被列入限制的名单时，特朗普点名提到了《纽约时报》与《华盛顿邮报》，同时表示无论该禁令最终能否在法庭上立足，指出这些问题都是有益的。

During a subsequent press availability in the Oval Office, Trump described the decision as the result of cumulative coverage over the past few years, telling reporters the action was taken because the outlets report fake news while denying that he intended to intimidate the press. When pressed about what other news organizations might face similar measures, Trump singled out The New York Times and The Washington Post, adding that pointing out these issues was worthwhile regardless of whether the ban survives legal scrutiny in court.

在特朗普宣布禁令后，行政部门并未立即采取将相关记者驱离白宫的实质举措。知情人士透露，白宫新闻处等部分内部工作人员对该决定感到猝不及防，在缺少具体实施细则的情况下试图了解禁令对日常运作的实际影响。直至周五傍晚，被点名的CNN与Politico记者依然在白宫各自的工作区内正常办公，相关人员进出白宫园区的权限未见立竿见影的改变。

Following Donald Trump's announcement, the administration showed no immediate signs of taking formal administrative steps to remove targeted reporters from the complex. A source familiar with the situation indicated that several White House staffers, including members of the press office, were caught off guard by the post and were left trying to determine how the directive would affect daily newsroom operations. Journalists from CNN and Politico remained at their White House workspaces through Friday evening, with no immediate physical restrictions imposed on their credentials or physical access.

媒体轮值报道安排也暂未受到直接干扰。禁令宣布当天，CNN报道团队继续作为指定电视同行记者，随同副总统JD·万斯往返艾奥瓦州参加活动。此外，作为数十年来与福克斯新闻等五大电视网轮值随行报道的成员，CNN此前已被选定在下周特朗普出席联合国大会期间担任随行报道轮值媒体，目前该安排尚未出现官方调整迹象。

Established press pool duties also continued uninterrupted in the immediate aftermath. On Friday, a CNN crew traveled as the assigned television pool reporters with Vice President JD Vance on a trip to and from an event in Iowa. As part of the five-network rotation that has traveled with US presidents for decades alongside Fox News and other broadcasters, CNN had already been scheduled to lead network pool coverage on Monday when Trump attends the United Nations General Assembly, with no formal changes to that schedule announced.

被点名的两家主要新闻机构随即发表正式声明，对特朗普的禁令予以公开反驳。CNN表示，该机构全力支持其白宫报道团队及其公正准确的报道，并依据美国宪法享有不受政府阻碍或干涉开展报道的权利，若禁令付诸实施，将构成对宪法保障权利的违法侵害。Politico亦发表声明表示，将继续公正报道本届及未来的白宫政府，并将坚定捍卫其宪法第一修正案权利，抵制任何限制企图。原名MSNBC的MS NOW则未对禁令声明作出即时回应。

Two of the targeted news organizations swiftly issued official statements pushing back against Donald Trump's declared restrictions. CNN stated that it stands fully behind its White House reporting team and their fair and accurate journalism, asserting its constitutional right to report on the administration without government hindrance or interference, while adding that enforcing such a ban would represent an illegal assault on fundamental protected rights. Politico similarly pledged to continue fair coverage of the current and future administrations, affirming that it will vigorously defend its First Amendment rights against any attempts at suppression. MS NOW, formerly known as MSNBC, declined to provide an immediate comment.

除了新闻准入问题，Politico还对特朗普在禁令帖文中提出的财务指控作出专门澄清。特朗普曾声称美国政府向Politico支付了高达800万美元的非法订阅费用，相关说法源于政府效率部（DOGE）早前的指控。Politico公关团队在社交平台X上明确驳斥，指责其接受政府补贴的说法纯属虚假，并指出该言论此前已被彻底证伪。

Politico also directly addressed financial assertions included in Trump's announcement post, in which he claimed the federal government had paid an illegal and ridiculous $8 million subscription to the outlet, a talking point stemming from assertions made in early 2025 by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). In a post on X, Politico's communications team firmly rejected the allegation, stating that claims regarding government subsidies are false and have been thoroughly debunked.

针对特朗普的限制措施，白宫记者协会发表声明对被点名的媒体同行表示声援。国家新闻俱乐部主席马克·舍夫（Mark Schoeff Jr.）明确批评，基于行政部门对报道内容的不满而禁止新闻机构进入白宫，是试图控制由谁来见证和报道总统权力的行使。美国笔会新闻与虚假信息主管蒂姆·理查森（Tim Richardson）以及新闻自由基金会倡导主管塞斯·斯特恩（Seth Stern）等倡导人士也公开发声，谴责行政部门打压知情公众与新闻自由的行为。

Press freedom and journalist advocacy groups mobilized rapid public opposition following Donald Trump's declared restrictions. The White House Correspondents' Association issued a formal statement expressing solidarity with the singled-out newsrooms. Mark Schoeff Jr., president of the National Press Club, criticized the ban as an attempt to control which voices are allowed to witness and report on the exercise of presidential power based on administrative disapproval of coverage. Other press freedom leaders, including Tim Richardson of PEN America and Seth Stern of the Freedom of the Press Foundation, similarly denounced the move as an attack on constitutional press protections.

司法先例为媒体对白宫准入限制发起诉讼提供了法律依据。根据过往判例，一旦向记者发放了采访通行证，行政部门便不能任意予以拒绝或吊销，白宫必须遵循正当程序并提供合理的通知与回应机会。CNN曾在2018年因白宫试图吊销记者吉姆·阿科斯塔（Jim Acosta）的采访凭证而诉诸法庭，并成功获得法院命令恢复通行证。此外，本届政府目前仍因先前试图限制美联社记者进入特定区域而身陷相关诉讼。

Legal precedents set substantial constitutional hurdles against the arbitrary denial of press access. Established judicial rulings dictate that once press credentials are provided, government authorities cannot deny or revoke them arbitrarily, requiring the White House to observe fair standards, provide notice, and offer an opportunity to respond. On that legal basis, CNN won a court order in 2018 that restored the revoked press pass of reporter Jim Acosta. The Trump administration also faces ongoing legal challenges over past attempts to exclude Associated Press journalists from specific White House spaces.