五角大楼将网络直播胡德堡枪手行刑队枪决Pentagon to Livestream Firing Squad Execution of Fort Hood Shooter

美国国防部长皮特·赫格塞斯在接受保守派媒体“真实美洲之声”采访时说明了这一决定的核心诉求，强调公众将能够观看哈桑被执行死刑的全过程。赫格塞斯指出，必须让公众清楚认识到制造此类恶性事件必然面临严峻后果。他在受访时表示哈桑将由士兵组成的行刑队执行枪决，并认为这种方式理应如此。当被问及哈桑是否提出了任何最终请求或联络唐纳德·特朗普总统时，赫格塞斯回应称并不在乎，并直接确认双方将在12月3日面对行刑。

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth outlined the core rationale behind the decision during an interview with conservative media outlet Real America's Voice, emphasizing that the public will be permitted to watch Hasan's execution. Hegseth said people need to understand that there are serious consequences for such actions. He added that Hasan would face a firing squad of soldiers, stating that this was as it should be. When questioned about whether Hasan had submitted any final requests or attempted to reach out to President Donald Trump, Hegseth dismissed the inquiry, answering that he did not care and confirming that the execution date remained set for December 3.

五角大楼官员随后证实，军方将对执行过程进行网络直播，后续会公布具体技术与安排细节。美军上一次执行死刑是在1961年4月，当时一名陆军中士因强奸与谋杀罪被处以绞刑，而哈桑案将是二战结束以来美军首次采用行刑队枪决方式处死犯人。这也是美国现代历史上罕见的公开处决举措。死刑法律研究学者约翰·米尔斯指出，在当代对死刑进行网络直播史无前例，并让该项决定处于不确定的法律领域。

Pentagon officials subsequently clarified that the firing squad execution at Fort Hood will be broadcast via an online livestream, with operational details to follow. The event marks the first US military execution since April 1961, when an Army sergeant was hanged for rape and murder, and the military's first execution by firing squad since the end of World War II. It also represents an extraordinarily rare public execution in modern American history. John Mills, an attorney representing death row inmates, noted that livestreaming an execution is unprecedented in the modern era and places the administration's plan on uncertain legal terrain.

尼达尔·哈桑曾是来自弗吉尼亚州的美国陆军精神科医生。2009年，他在胡德堡军事基地一处拥挤的医疗大楼内开枪射击，承认杀害了13名手无寸铁的美国军人。在2013年的军事法庭审判中，哈桑向法庭为其所犯的任何过失致歉，同时陈述称自己当时的行径是为了保护穆斯林以及阿富汗的塔利班势力。

Nidal Hasan, a former US Army psychiatrist from Virginia, admitted to fatally shooting 13 unarmed soldiers inside a crowded medical processing facility at Fort Hood in 2009. During his court-martial proceedings in 2013, Hasan apologized for any mistakes but explained to the military court that he believed his actions were intended to protect Muslims and the Taliban in Afghanistan.

采用行刑队处决在当下美国死刑执行中具有多重现实与文化层面的考量。维拉诺瓦大学法学院教授布伦纳·菲塞尔指出，由于许多州在获取死刑药物或寻找愿意参与的医护专业人员上面临障碍，尤其是在田纳西州克里斯塔·派克发生注射死刑失误事件后，行刑队被部分观点视为相对不那么残忍的替代手段，具备更快、更干净和更精确的特征。菲塞尔同时分析认为，行刑队带有公众所感知的男子气概和军事属性，这体现了赫格塞斯试图强化的致命战力文化。

The decision to employ a firing squad aligns with practical and cultural factors currently confronting capital punishment in the United States. Brenner Fissell, a law professor at Villanova University and vice president of the National Institute of Military Justice, explained that many states have encountered difficulties carrying out lethal injections due to challenges in securing execution drugs or finding willing medical professionals, questions renewed after the botched lethal injection of Christa Pike in Tennessee. Fissell observed that firing squads can offer a quicker, cleaner, and more precise execution, while noting that Hegseth is also seeking to emphasize a perceived masculinity and military character rooted in what he described as a lethality culture.

在2009年袭击中身中七枪的前陆军中士阿隆佐·伦斯福德对行刑方式表达了明确支持。伦斯福德在接受英国广播公司《今日》节目采访时表示，行刑队枪决是符合哈桑罪行的处决方式。他计划亲自前往现场见证执行，并表示希望在行刑人员扣动扳机之前让哈桑看着自己的眼睛，让哈桑知道其袭击企图失败了，自己依然活着。

Former US Army Sergeant Alonzo Lunsford, who survived after being shot seven times during the 2009 base attack, voiced clear support for putting Hasan to death by firing squad. Speaking to the BBC Today programme, Lunsford described the firing squad method as befitting Hasan's actions. He stated that he intends to attend the execution in person, explaining that before the trigger is pulled, he wants Hasan to look directly into his eyes so that Hasan knows his effort failed and that Lunsford remains alive.

针对五角大楼计划进行网络直播的安排，伦斯福德表达了复杂的态度。他不赞成允许所有公众随意观看网络直播，担忧向年轻人传递不良影响。伦斯福德同时坚持认为，应当向受害者、死难者家属以及幸存者家属提供未经审查的观看机会，确保承受袭击创伤的人员能够完整目睹死刑的执行。

Regarding the Pentagon plan to broadcast the execution, Lunsford expressed reservations about an open-access public livestream. He cautioned that not everyone should be permitted to watch the broadcast, citing concerns over the impact and message such footage might send to younger audiences. At the same time, Lunsford maintained that the families of the fallen, survivors, and their families should be granted direct access, arguing that those affected by the shooting should be able to view the proceedings uncensored.

网络直播计划面临来自国际机构与美国立法者的强烈批评。联合国人权高专办向法新社指出，网络直播处决等同于公开处决，违反了绝对禁止酷刑的规定。民主党参议员克里斯·墨菲在接受美国有线电视新闻网采访时谴责这一构想令人作呕，并表示这让人联想到伊斯兰国极端组织实施的处决行为。加州大学伯克利分校法学院死刑诊所联席主任伊丽莎白·塞梅尔指出，由政府主动发起公开处决在历史上极其罕见，引发了有关被告尊严、观众准入资格以及特朗普政府制造罕见轰动效应动机等一系列法律与公共政策层面的严重质问。

The livestreaming proposal has encountered stern condemnation from international bodies and American lawmakers. The United Nations human rights office told AFP that broadcasting the execution online would be tantamount to a public execution and would breach the absolute prohibition of torture. Democratic Senator Chris Murphy told CNN that the concept was disgusting and reminiscent of executions conducted by the Islamic State militant group. Elisabeth Semel, co-director of the Death Penalty Clinic at UC Berkeley Law, observed that government instigation of a televised execution is practically unprecedented, raising substantial legal and public policy issues regarding defendant dignity, viewer eligibility, and the Trump administration's intent to orchestrate an unusual public spectacle.

除伦理争议外，辩护策略可能使原定执行时间表遭遇法律阻碍。法律专家指出，哈桑可以选择抵抗执行，并向民事法院提出人身保护令上诉，以审查羁押与执行的合法性。耶鲁大学法学院专门研究军事法的客座讲师尤金·R·菲德尔分析表示，相关民事司法审查进程完全有可能拖延到当前政府任期结束之后，而下一任政府是否会保留对执行死刑的相同意愿仍未可知。部分法律学者如福特汉姆大学法学教授德博拉·丹诺则提出不同视角，认为公开直播在透明度上具备一定价值，能够让公众充分了解死刑惩罚的具体含义与实施现实。

Capital defense procedures could also disrupt the planned timeline through prolonged legal challenges. Legal experts pointed out that Hasan could contest the execution by submitting a habeas corpus petition in civilian court to review the legality of his detention. Eugene R. Fidell, a visiting lecturer at Yale Law School specializing in military law, stated that such civilian court litigation might frankly outlast the current administration, leaving it uncertain whether a subsequent administration would maintain the same inclination for executions. Conversely, Fordham University law professor Deborah Denno suggested livestreaming could inject transparency into capital punishment by fully informing the public about the true nature of executions.