印度反对派游行进逼最高法院 要求首席选举专员辞职India Opposition Marches on Supreme Court to Demand Election Chief Resign

10月12日周一，拉胡尔·甘地带领数十名反对党议员与青年抗议者乘坐巴士离开宪法俱乐部，在巴拉坎巴路汇合后徒步向最高法院进发。参与队伍的包括国大党主席马利卡朱·哈尔格、阿基莱什·亚达夫、索加塔·罗伊与特贾什维·普拉萨德·亚达夫等“印度”国家发展包容联盟的核心成员，以及数千名来自左翼学生组织和“蟑螂民众党”的年轻示威者。示威队伍沿途高呼口号，将矛头直指首席选举专员贾内什·库马尔，要求其对选民名册修订争议负责并引咎辞职。

On Monday, October 12, Rahul Gandhi led dozens of opposition lawmakers and youth demonstrators who departed by bus from the Constitution Club and gathered at Barakhamba Road to begin their foot march toward the Supreme Court. The procession brought together prominent figures from the INDIA alliance—including Mallikarjun Kharge, Akhilesh Yadav, Saugata Roy, and Tejashwi Prasad Yadav—alongside thousands of left-wing students and youth supporters aligned with the Cockroach Janta Party. Demonstrators demanded the immediate resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar over alleged alterations to the voter rolls.

甘地在周一的新闻发布会上指控莫迪政府已将首都“关进监狱”，并要求就涉嫌选举操纵对库马尔提起叛国罪指控。尽管警方在主要道路设置重型金属路障并关闭交通走廊，游行队伍仍向司法核心区推进。根据最高法院行政管理部门达成的安排，甘地及其他五至十名反对派领袖获准在其随行律师的陪同下进入最高法院建筑内部的立案柜台办理请愿事宜，使这场街头动员迅速向最高司法机关施压。

During a Monday press briefing, Gandhi claimed the Modi administration had effectively placed the capital city behind bars and asserted that Kumar should be tried for treason over the electoral roll dispute. In response to the march, authorities positioned heavy metal barriers and disrupted traffic corridors across central Delhi. Under a protocol established with court administrators, Gandhi and between five to ten opposition leaders, accompanied by legal counsel, received permission to access the filing counter inside the Supreme Court complex to submit their grievance.

自2025年6月以来，印度选举委员会启动了覆盖各邦的“特别强化修订”选民名单更新程序。在此期间，草案名册中累计删除了超过1.3亿个名字。反对派政党与批评人士指出，这一大规模剔除过程不成比例地剥夺了少数群体及其他弱势群体的投票资格，导致数以百万计的合法选民失去登记，并指责该机构是在执政党印度人民党的授意下削弱选举公正性以获取选举利益。

Since June 2025, the Election Commission of India has undertaken a nationwide process known as the Special Intensive Revision to update voter lists across states. In the course of this initiative, the agency removed more than 130 million names from draft electoral rolls. Opposition leaders and critics allege that the widespread deletions disproportionately disenfranchised minority communities and other vulnerable groups, stripping millions of genuine voters of their franchise to deliver an advantage to Prime Minister Narendra Modi's ruling Bharatiya Janata Party.

此外，选举委员会内部运作也遭到公开批评。相关爆料显示，首席选举专员贾内什·库马尔频繁否决另外两位选举专员就选民数据库变更完整性提出的疑虑。面对操纵指控，选举委员会坚决否认存在违规行为，坚称删除名单属于针对已故、迁移以及重复登记者的常规清理，印度人民党同样反驳了反对派关于选举机构偏袒执政势力的指责。

Scrutiny intensified following revelations that Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar repeatedly overruled concerns raised by the other two election commissioners regarding the integrity of database alterations. Opposition parties have maintained that the commission operates under government influence to compromise elections. The Election Commission of India strongly rejects all allegations of misconduct, defending the deletions as standard administrative maintenance to remove deceased, relocated, and duplicate entries, while the BJP likewise denies manipulating the voting apparatus.

青年运动团体“蟑螂民众党”（CJP）起源于2026年5月。当时最高法院首席大法官苏里亚·坎特将持有虚假或伪造文凭的人群称为“蟑螂”，这一言论被广泛视为对面临教育和就业困境的印度年轻人的轻视。阿比吉特·迪普克随即顺势借用这一称号，创立了一个讽刺性质的在线平台。该网络平台迅速转变为具有街头号召力的青年组织。迪普克反复声明该团体不是已注册的政党，而是由Z世代领导、旨在强化民主的施压运动，但外界分析人士推测其可能逐步涉足选举政治。

The youth organization Cockroach Janta Party traces its beginnings to May 2026, after Chief Justice Surya Kant described individuals holding fake or bogus academic credentials as 'cockroaches,' a remark widely interpreted as a dismissive swipe at young Indians struggling with education and employment conditions. Abhijeet Dipke embraced the slight and launched a satirical digital initiative that rapidly expanded into an influential street protest network. While Dipke has consistently maintained that the group is not an officially registered political party—characterizing it instead as a Gen Z-led pressure movement dedicated to strengthening democratic accountability—its expanding organizational footprint has led political observers to speculate about future participation in electoral politics.

在7月的夏季抗议活动中，该运动通过集会施压成功促使教育部长下台，并在此后将诉求转向选举争议。在10月10日周六，警方因认定游行缺乏治安许可而拘捕了迪普克等骨干成员，随后于周日将其释放。随着德里警方取消传统集会地点简塔·曼塔尔天文台的示威资格，CJP成员阿舒托什·兰卡在社交媒体X上向警方下达24小时通牒，要求指定在简塔·曼塔尔举行集会的日期，并威胁若未获批准将发出进一步抗议号召。

The movement established its public leverage during nationwide student mobilizations that successfully forced the resignation of India's education minister in July. Over the weekend preceding Monday's march, Delhi authorities detained Dipke on Saturday ahead of an unapproved demonstration before releasing him alongside fellow organizers on Sunday. Following the police decision to denotify Jantar Mantar as an authorized demonstration site, CJP leader Ashutosh Ranka issued a 24-hour ultimatum to Delhi police on social media platform X, demanding an approved date to protest at the historic venue or face another unilateral call for mass street action.

为应对持续升级的抗议活动，德里警方连续第三天在市中心部署了数千名警察与安全人员，关闭了6个德里地铁站，并在关键道路架设重型金属路障。在周末期间，执法部门大规模拘留了数千名试图举行抗议游行的学生及示威者。印度共产党（马克思主义）议员约翰·布里塔斯表示，自己在周日的示威中遭到警方的粗暴推搡、拖拽和袭击。此外，国际非政府组织无国界记者指出，至少16名佩戴明显记者证报道抗议的记者在周末期间遭到野蛮拘留。面对外界关于羁押与暴力执法指控的质询，警方在周日的新闻发布会上未予回应。

Facing sustained street mobilization, Delhi authorities deployed thousands of police and security personnel across central New Delhi for a third consecutive day, closing six metro stations and setting up heavy metal barricades along major transport corridors. Over the weekend, law enforcement officers detained thousands of protesters and student demonstrators attempting to conduct marches. Communist Party of India (Marxist) parliamentarian John Brittas stated that police manhandled, dragged, and assaulted him during Sunday's demonstrations. International NGO Reporters Without Borders reported that at least 16 journalists were brutally detained while covering the weekend rallies despite displaying visible press credentials. Police officials did not respond to questions regarding the detentions or alleged custodial force during a Sunday press briefing.

除了实施人员拘捕，德里警方在周一正式宣布将简塔·曼塔尔天文台从法定指定集会地点中除名，并指引集会组织者转往中德里的罗摩衍那广场、北德里的布拉里广场或东德里的CBD广场。作为长期集会活动核心据点的简塔·曼塔尔被取消资格，迅速招致“蟑螂民众党”等团体的强烈反对，斥责警方的这一决定完全不可接受。示威组织方指控政府试图通过场地限制与大规模拘留压制异见声音，而针对抗议管制措施的法律争议与街头对峙也随之进一步加深。

Administrative restrictions also tightened on Monday when Delhi police announced that Jantar Mantar is no longer a designated site for protests, listing Ramlila Ground, Burari Ground, and CBD Ground as alternative protest venues. The Cockroach Janta Party strongly condemned the decision to denotify the historic demonstration center, labeling the measure unacceptable. Protest organizers maintained that shifting demonstrators away from central Delhi while detaining media workers and participants constitutes an effort to suppress public dissent, deepening friction over constitutional expression rights.

在游行开展前，印度反对派代表团曾尝试直接接触最高司法层，但最高法院首席大法官苏里亚·坎特回绝了该代表团的直接会面请求，敦促其通过既定的司法程序提交正式请愿书。与此同时，针对周末期间警方采取的大规模阻截与羁押行动，最高法院在周日做出一项明确裁定，强调在德里进行的和平、非武装抗议示威者除非依照法定正当程序，否则不得遭到拘留。最高法院同时向当局发出指令，要求确保德里地铁与铁路交通系统保持正常运行。

Prior to the street demonstration, the opposition delegation sought direct high-level judicial intervention, but Chief Justice of India Surya Kant turned down their request for an in-person meeting and urged alliance leaders to submit a formal petition instead. Amid the weekend security clampdown, the Supreme Court had intervened on Sunday by issuing a ruling that peaceful, unarmed protesters in Delhi could not be detained except in accordance with legal procedures. The court also issued directives instructing authorities to ensure that metro and railway services continued to operate normally rather than being disrupted by security restrictions.

在最高法院明确拒绝当面接见并要求依规立案后，拉胡尔·甘地协同马利卡朱·哈尔格、阿基莱什·亚达夫、索加塔·罗伊以及特贾什维·普拉萨德·亚达夫等“印度”联盟核心领袖，正式向最高法院提交了针对首席选举专员贾内什·库马尔的诉状。该请愿书指控选民名册的系统性修改存在严重违规，要求司法系统介入调查大规模名单删除行为，此举标志着反对党正式将围绕选民名册的政治风暴由街头游行延伸至宪法诉讼轨道。

Following the court's refusal to grant a private audience and its instruction to pursue standard judicial channels, Rahul Gandhi alongside senior INDIA alliance leaders Mallikarjun Kharge, Akhilesh Yadav, Saugata Roy, and Tejashwi Prasad Yadav formally filed their petition against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. The legal filing centers on allegations of widespread irregularities during the electoral roll revisions that resulted in mass deletions, anchoring the ongoing street protests into a formal court challenge over election oversight and administrative accountability.