加州上诉法院维持哈维·温斯坦强奸判决但撤销16年刑期下令重新量刑California Court Upholds Harvey Weinstein's Rape Conviction but Orders Resentencing

美国加利福尼亚州第二区上诉法院的一个三人法官小组一致做出裁决，维持了对前电影大亨哈维·温斯坦于2022年因强奸和性侵犯被判有罪的判决。上诉法院在裁决中明确指出，原审法官在审判过程中并没有侵犯温斯坦的宪法权利，因此驳回了他试图推翻陪审团有罪判决的各项诉求。在维持定罪的同时，该上诉法院宣布撤销原审判决中对温斯坦处以的16年监禁刑期。

A three-judge panel from California's 2nd District Court of Appeal unanimously issued the decision to uphold the 2022 rape and sexual assault conviction of former movie mogul Harvey Weinstein. In their ruling, the appellate judges rejected Weinstein's attempts to disturb the jury's guilty verdicts, stating that the trial judge did not violate his constitutional rights. While affirming the conviction itself, the appeals court vacated the 16-year prison sentence that had been imposed on him.

根据加州第二区上诉法院在线发布的最新动态，该案的判决结果为“撤销原判刑期，并将案件发回重审以重新量刑”，而在其他所有方面则维持原判。这意味着温斯坦虽然仍被认定犯有强奸和性侵罪，但他的具体服刑期限将由原审法官重新予以评估和裁决。这一裁决使得温斯坦自2020年以来因多起诉讼而被监禁的法律状态出现了新的变化。

According to an online update posted by the California 2nd District Court of Appeal, the court declared that the sentence is vacated and the matter is remanded for resentencing, while the judgment is affirmed in all other respects. This ruling sends the case back to the trial judge to determine a new prison term for Weinstein, who has been behind bars since 2020 under multiple prosecutions.

加利福尼亚州第二区上诉法院的三人法官小组在裁决中详细阐明了下令重新量刑的具体原因。该小组指出，原审法官在最初决定哈维·温斯坦的刑期长度时，将他在纽约州获得的定罪列为了加重处罚因素。然而，这些作为量刑依据的纽约州定罪在随后已经被法院依法推翻并予以撤销，因此不能再继续作为确定其加州刑期长短的合法考量因素。

The three-judge panel from California's 2nd District Court of Appeal detailed the specific reason for ordering the resentencing of Harvey Weinstein. According to the appellate court, the trial judge had considered Weinstein's prior convictions in New York as an aggravating factor when determining the length of his prison term. However, those New York convictions were subsequently thrown out and overturned, meaning they could no longer legally serve as a basis for enhancing his sentence in the California case.

针对这一法律程序问题，加利福尼亚州总检察长也表达了相同的立场，对原审法官在量刑时考虑已被推翻的纽约定罪这一做法表示同意。由于这一关键的量刑依据在法律上已不复存在，上诉法院最终裁定必须撤销原判的16年监禁刑期，并将案件发回原审法官，以便在排除该加重处罚因素后重新评估并做出新的量刑裁决。

California's attorney general agreed with this assessment, concurring that the trial judge should not have factored the invalidated New York convictions into the sentencing decision. Because the aggravating factor used to justify the original 16-year prison term was no longer legally valid, the appellate panel determined that the sentence must be vacated and the matter remanded so the trial judge can calculate a new sentence without relying on the overturned convictions.

针对加利福尼亚州第二区上诉法院做出的最新裁决，哈维·温斯坦的发言人朱达·恩格尔迈尔在发送的一封电子邮件中发表声明，详细表达了温斯坦代表方的立场。恩格尔迈尔在声明中明确指出，他们对法院做出的这一决定感到失望，并且对上诉法院关于温斯坦审判公正性的结论持不赞同态度。他强调，温斯坦方面尊重但无法认同法院维持其2022年强奸和性侵犯有罪判决的最终结论。

In response to the ruling by the California 2nd District Court of Appeal, Harvey Weinstein's spokesperson, Juda Engelmayer, released a statement via email detailing the defense's position. Engelmayer expressed clear disappointment with the appellate court's decision, stating that they respectfully disagree with the conclusions reached regarding the overall fairness of Weinstein's trial. He emphasized that the defense team does not agree with the court's decision to uphold the 2022 rape and sexual assault conviction.

尽管对维持有罪判决的裁定表示强烈反对，温斯坦的发言人也对上诉法院判决中的另一项内容表达了认可。恩格尔迈尔在声明中指出，上诉法院正确地认识到了温斯坦原先被判处的16年监禁刑期是无法成立的。温斯坦代表方对法院撤销该刑期并下令重新量刑的决定表示赞同，认为这一部分裁决符合法律事实，纠正了原审法官在量刑时将已被推翻的纽约定罪作为加重处罚因素的错误。

While strongly objecting to the affirmed conviction, Weinstein's representative acknowledged and agreed with the appellate court's determination regarding the prison term. Engelmayer noted in his statement that the court correctly recognized that the original 16-year sentence could not stand. The defense team concurred with the decision to vacate the sentence and remand the case for resentencing, viewing it as a proper correction of the trial judge's reliance on the overturned New York convictions.

在加利福尼亚州上诉法院做出上述裁决的前一天，纽约州的诉讼程序也取得了重大进展。纽约检方于2026年6月25日正式决定放弃对哈维·温斯坦进行第四次审判，并撤销了这起具有代表性的案件。检方做出这一决定的直接原因，是该案的指控者明确表示自己无法再次承受出庭作证并接受质询的巨大精神压力。

The decision by the California appeals court came just one day after prosecutors in New York made a significant move in their own legal battle against Harvey Weinstein. On June 25, 2026, New York prosecutors decided to drop their case and decline a fourth trial, officially dismissing the charges. This decision was made after the accuser in the case stated that she could not bear the emotional distress of testifying in court once again.

在此之前，温斯坦在纽约的强奸指控在经历了一次定罪被推翻以及随后两次陪审团未能达成一致裁决后，一直处于悬而未决的状态。尽管该起强奸指控已被纽约检方撤销，但温斯坦在纽约仍因另一项性犯罪重罪被定罪，并且他目前依然处于监禁状态，自2020年以来一直被关押在监狱中。

Prior to this dismissal, the New York rape charge had remained unresolved following an overturned conviction and two subsequent hung juries. Despite the dismissal of this specific case, Weinstein remains behind bars and still stands convicted of another sexual felony in New York, continuing his period of incarceration that has kept him imprisoned since 2020.