纽约市长马姆达尼称正研究在内塔尼亚胡访美时将其逮捕NYC Mayor Mamdani Explores Potential Arrest of Netanyahu During September Visit
纽约市长佐兰·马姆达尼近日在接受《纽约时报》采访时表示,其政府正与市法务部门进行“积极讨论”,以研究该市是否拥有法律权限,在以色列总理本雅明·内塔尼亚胡预计于今年9月访问纽约参加联合国大会时将其逮捕。马姆达尼在受访时称内塔尼亚胡为“战争罪犯”,并直言其“属于海牙”。这一表态迅速引发了外界关于地方市长在外交事务中权限边界的广泛质疑。国际刑事法院(ICC)曾于2024年对内塔尼亚胡签发逮捕令,指控其犯有战争罪。然而,美国并未批准旨在履行此类逮捕义务的《罗马规约》,且民主党拜登政府与共和党特朗普政府均对该逮捕令表示谴责。特朗普政府近期更是升级了对国际刑事法院的对抗,国务卿马尔科·卢比奥甚至承诺将“拆除”该法院。马姆达尼则强调,其政府无意超越法律界限,目前正通过法律部门厘清地方权限。
New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani stated in an interview with The New York Times that his administration is in "active conversation" with the city's Law Department to explore whether the city has the legal authority to arrest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during his potential visit for the United Nations General Assembly in September. Mamdani, who called Netanyahu a "war criminal" who "belongs in The Hague," is seeking to act on a campaign promise. The move has raised immediate questions regarding the limits of a local mayor's authority over foreign affairs. The International Criminal Court (ICC) issued an arrest warrant for Netanyahu in 2024, but the United States has not ratified the Rome Statute, which would oblige countries to carry out such arrests. Furthermore, both the Trump and Biden administrations have strongly denounced the ICC warrant, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently pledging to "dismantle" the court. Mamdani emphasized that while his administration is exploring local legal avenues, they have no interest in going outside the bounds of legality.

01马姆达尼的表态与法律咨询Mamdani's Statements and Legal Consultations
纽约市长佐兰·马姆达尼在接受《纽约时报》“The Interview”播客节目采访时,详细阐述了他对以色列总理内塔尼亚胡的立场。马姆达尼明确指出,内塔尼亚胡是一名被国际刑事法院指控的“战争罪犯”,并直言其“属于海牙”。他强调,由于内塔尼亚胡过去多年的所作所为,许多人都持有与他相同的看法。这一表态也是马姆达尼在竞选期间所作承诺的延续。
During an appearance on The New York Times' "The Interview" podcast, New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani detailed his stance on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, calling him a "war criminal" who has been charged by the International Criminal Court and "belongs in The Hague." Mamdani asserted that this opinion is shared by many people purely because of the actions Netanyahu has taken over the last several years. The mayor's pursuit of this matter aligns with a promise he previously made on the campaign trail.
针对具体的逮捕计划,马姆达尼透露其政府正与市法务部门进行“积极讨论”,以厘清纽约市所拥有的具体法律权限。在被问及法律是否允许其采取此类行动时,马姆达尼表示,尽管联邦层面有时会出现超越法律界限、自行制定法律的意图,但他的政府对此并不感兴趣,他们无意在法律框架之外行事。
Regarding the execution of any potential action, Mamdani explained that his administration is in an "active conversation" with the city's Law Department to determine what legal authority New York City actually possesses. When questioned about what he believes the law permits him to do, Mamdani noted that while there is sometimes a desire at the national level to go outside the bounds of legality and write one's own laws, his administration has no interest in operating outside of the legal framework.
02联大访问背景与市长权力争议UNGA Visit Context and Mayor's Authority Debate
此次逮捕计划针对的是以色列总理内塔尼亚胡预计于今年9月前往纽约参加联合国大会的行程。作为主权国家领导人,内塔尼亚胡的潜在访问属于外交事务范畴,而纽约市长佐兰·马姆达尼试图对其采取法律行动的表态,迅速引发了外界关于地方官员权力边界的激烈讨论。舆论普遍质疑,一个地方城市的市长是否拥有对到访的外国政府首脑采取此类司法行动的法律权限。
The proposed arrest plan targets Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's anticipated travel to New York in September to attend the United Nations General Assembly. Because Netanyahu is a foreign head of government, his potential visit falls under the domain of international diplomacy. Mayor Zohran Mamdani's statements regarding a potential arrest have immediately triggered intense debate over the constitutional and legal limits of a local mayor's authority in foreign affairs.
尽管马姆达尼坚称其政府正在通过市法务部门积极评估地方权限,但这一举动被广泛认为触及了地方自治与联邦外交事务权力的敏感界限。在复杂的国际关系与外交豁免权框架下,地方政府是否有权干涉并逮捕受邀参加联合国会议的外国领导人,成为法律与政治学者关注的焦点。这一争议也让地方市长在国家外交政策和国际法执行中所扮演的角色面临新的审视。
The situation raises unprecedented questions about whether a municipal administration has any legal standing to take law enforcement action against a visiting foreign leader. While Mamdani has emphasized that his administration is working closely with the city's Law Department to clarify their exact legal powers, legal experts and observers are questioning whether a local city official can bypass federal diplomatic protocols. This clash highlights the ongoing tension regarding the extent to which local governments can intervene in matters traditionally reserved for federal foreign policy.
市长马姆达尼在纽约市的政治崛起与政策推进Mayor Mamdani's Political Rise and Policy Push in NYC
梳理民主社会主义市长马姆达尼在纽约市的政治根基与近期政策进展,以理解其挑战联邦外交政策的底气
Trace the political rise and policy milestones of Democratic Socialist Mayor Mamdani in NYC to understand the context of his challenge to federal foreign policy
在纽约州民主党初选中,马姆达尼支持的进步派候选人布拉德·兰德以绝对优势击败现任联邦众议员丹·高德曼,巩固了马姆达尼在市内的政治版图。
In the New York Democratic primary, Mamdani-backed progressive candidate Brad Lander defeated incumbent Representative Dan Goldman by a wide margin, consolidating Mamdani's political footprint in the city.
纽约市租金指南委员会投票批准冻结该市约100万套租金管制公寓的租金,兑现了马姆达尼上任半年来的核心竞选承诺。
The New York City Rent Guidelines Board voted to freeze rents for approximately 1 million rent-stabilized apartments, fulfilling a core campaign promise of Mamdani's first six months in office.
纽约市长马姆达尼透露,其政府正与市法务部门积极讨论,研究在以色列总理内塔尼亚胡9月访美参加联大时将其逮捕的法律权限。
NYC Mayor Mamdani revealed his administration is actively consulting with the city's Law Department to explore the legal authority to arrest Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu during his September UNGA visit.
03国际刑事法院逮捕令与美国法律背景ICC Warrant and US Legal Framework
国际刑事法院(ICC)于2024年对以色列总理内塔尼亚胡及其他以色列领导人签发了逮捕令,指控其在2023年10月7日哈马斯袭击以色列期间及之后犯有战争罪。尽管该逮捕令在国际上引发了广泛关注,但其在美国的法律效力面临着根本性的制度障碍。作为国际刑事法院的创立协定,旨在履行此类逮捕义务的《罗马规约》至今未获得美国的批准。
The International Criminal Court (ICC) issued an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and other Israeli leaders in 2024, accusing them of war crimes committed during and after the October 7, 2023, Hamas attacks on Israel. While the warrant represents a significant international legal action, its enforcement within the United States faces fundamental statutory barriers due to the country's relationship with the court.
由于美国并非《罗马规约》的缔约国,因此在法律上并不承担逮捕国际刑事法院通缉人员的义务。这一法律背景意味着,即便国际刑事法院对内塔尼亚胡签发了逮捕令,美国联邦及地方政府在国际法框架下也并无协助执行该逮捕令的法定职责。这一关键的法律缺口,使得任何试图在美国本土执行该逮捕令的尝试都面临着巨大的法律与管辖权障碍。
Specifically, the United States has not ratified the Rome Statute, the international treaty that established the ICC and obliges signatory nations to arrest individuals facing the court's warrants. Because the U.S. is not a party to this treaty, it is under no legal obligation to carry out arrests on behalf of the ICC. This lack of ratification creates a substantial legal gap, meaning that neither federal nor local authorities in the United States possess a treaty-based mandate to detain Netanyahu during his travels to the country.
04联邦政府对国际刑事法院的态度Federal Opposition to the ICC
尽管纽约市长马姆达尼试图探讨逮捕内塔尼亚胡的法律途径,但美国联邦政府对国际刑事法院(ICC)的逮捕令持坚决反对态度。无论是民主党的前总统乔·拜登政府,还是共和党的现任总统唐纳德·特朗普政府,均对国际刑事法院针对内塔尼亚胡及其他以色列领导人签发的逮捕令表示了强烈谴责。这种跨党派的一致反对,使得地方政府任何试图执行该逮捕令的尝试都与联邦政府的外交政策立场背道而驰。
While Mayor Mamdani explores potential local avenues for action, the United States federal government maintains a stance of firm opposition to the ICC's arrest warrants. Both the Democratic administration of former President Joe Biden and the Republican administration of President Donald Trump have strongly denounced the warrants issued against Benjamin Netanyahu and other Israeli leaders. This bipartisan condemnation at the federal level underscores a unified national policy that rejects the jurisdiction of the international court over non-signatory nations and their allies.
特朗普政府近期更是升级了与国际刑事法院的长期对抗。美国国务卿马尔科·卢比奥近期公开承诺将“拆除”该法院。卢比奥指责国际刑事法院并非在使用真正的法律,而是“利用所谓的国际法力量,向我们的国家发动一场不使用子弹或导弹的战争”。联邦层面的这种强硬立场,进一步表明了美国政府在维护自身及盟友主权、抵制国际司法管辖权方面的坚定决心。
The Trump administration has recently intensified its long-standing conflict with the international tribunal. Secretary of State Marco Rubio pledged to "dismantle" the court, accusing the ICC of "waging a war against our country, not with bullets or missiles" but rather through "the force of so-called international law." This aggressive stance from the federal executive branch highlights the immense political and legal barriers that any local municipal effort to enforce the ICC warrant would face within the United States.



