内塔尼亚胡下令调查并起诉纪录片《NAZA》受访以军官兵Netanyahu Orders Criminal Probe and Prosecution of Soldiers in 'NAZA' Film
以色列总理本雅明·内塔尼亚胡致信总检察长加利·巴哈拉夫-米亚拉、以军总参谋长埃亚勒·扎米尔中将以及国家安全局辛贝特负责人大卫·齐尼,要求紧急查明在调查纪录片《NAZA》中受访的以军士兵与军官身份,并针对严重信息安全罪行、刑事诽谤以及损害国家外交与安全利益提起刑事起诉。这部由尤瓦尔·亚伯拉罕与雷切尔·索尔执导、《卫报》联合制作的纪录片上个月在威尼斯国际电影节获得评委会特别奖,详细记录了以色列在加沙造成的大规模平民死亡,并基于机密泄露文件与匿名内部消息人士的证词展开调查。目前该片已在英国和美国等国上映,并计划在超过50个国家放映。内塔尼亚胡下令追查匿名受访军人,直接将以色列战时保密体制与记者的国际消息源保护机制推向对抗。这一指令随即引发媒体与法律界的反弹。《卫报》发言人与代表超过32万名新闻工作者的欧洲记者联合会指责以色列政府恐吓记者及其消息源,以转移国际社会对加沙平民伤亡的关注;而以色列军法署署长伊泰·奥菲尔此前评估指出,提起刑事起诉必须具备安全违规或泄露机密材料的明确证据,纪律处分则仍属可能。
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu instructed Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara, IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir, and Shin Bet head David Zini to urgently uncover the identities of Israeli soldiers and officers interviewed in the investigative documentary 'NAZA' and pursue criminal prosecution. In his formal letter, Netanyahu called for criminal investigations and charges covering serious information security offenses, criminal defamation, and harm to Israel's diplomatic and security interests. The film, directed by Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor and produced by The Guardian, details Israel's mass civilian casualties in Gaza and won the Special Jury Prize at the Venice International Film Festival last month before rolling out across cinemas in the United Kingdom, the United States, and more than 50 other countries. The prime minister's demand directly tests international protections for journalistic sources against Israeli wartime secrecy rules. It immediately triggered pushback from press freedom organizations and military legal authorities. The European Federation of Journalists and The Guardian condemned the move as an intimidation campaign designed to deflect attention from civilian deaths in Gaza, while Military Advocate General Itai Ofir noted that criminal prosecution requires clear evidence of security breaches or disclosures of classified material, leaving open the alternative of disciplinary action.

01内塔尼亚胡下令调查并起诉纪录片受访者Netanyahu Demands Criminal Probe and Prosecution of Documentary Whistleblowers
在正式发出的信函中,以色列总理内塔尼亚胡要求巴哈拉夫-米亚拉、扎米尔与齐尼采取紧急行动,查明所有卷入或出现在这部被其定性为诽谤电影中的人员身份。内塔尼亚胡在指令中具体要求展开刑事调查,并针对严重信息安全犯罪、刑事诽谤以及损害以色列外交与安全利益的行为提起正式起诉。
In his formal letter, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu instructed Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara, IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir, and Shin Bet Director David Zini to take urgent action to unmask the identities of anyone involved or appearing in what he described as a libel film. Netanyahu specifically demanded the opening of a comprehensive criminal investigation alongside prosecutions for severe information security violations, criminal defamation, and deliberate harm caused to Israel's diplomatic and security interests.
纪录片《NAZA》呈现了24名不具名以色列军方内部人士的证词,指控军队在加沙空袭行动中使用人工智能目标定位系统导致平民伤亡。内塔尼亚胡的信件将司法部门与情报安全机构直接置于协同执法的要求之下,责成辛贝特与军方统帅部彻底揭露匿名出镜或提供内幕情况的士兵与军官,推动国家刑事司法程序介入该纪录片的调查源头。
The investigative documentary features accounts from 24 unnamed Israeli military whistleblowers accusing the military of killing civilians in Gaza during strikes guided by artificial-intelligence targeting systems. By directing the head of the domestic security service and the military's top commander to coordinate directly with the chief prosecutor, Netanyahu sought to compel state intelligence and law enforcement apparatuses to dismantle the confidentiality shielding the soldiers and officers who provided inside testimonies.
02《NAZA》影片内容、制作背景与国际荣誉Documentary Content, Production Background, and International Reception
纪录片《NAZA》的片名取自以色列情报部门使用的一个委婉缩写词,用以表示在空袭中预计造成的平民死亡数量。该片由奥斯卡获奖导演尤瓦尔·亚伯拉罕与雷切尔·索尔执导,并在威尼斯国际电影节首映时获得了该展事历史上最长时间的起立鼓掌,最终斩获评委会特别奖。
The documentary NAZA derives its name from a euphemistic acronym employed by Israeli intelligence to denote the anticipated number of civilians killed in an airstrike. Directed by Oscar-winning filmmakers Yuval Abraham and Rachel Szor, the film held its world premiere at the Venice International Film Festival, where it received the longest standing ovation in the festival's history and took home the Special Jury Prize.
这部由《卫报》制作的纪录片建立在2023年至2025年间由巴以联合媒体《+972杂志》、希伯来语媒体《Local Call》以及《卫报》首次发表的调查披露基础之上。据《卫报》发言人介绍,制作团队在过去三年里采访了100多名熟悉以军在加沙战事中所用系统的消息人士,其中包括直接参与空袭批准的高级指挥官。评估证词可靠性的严谨流程包括比对泄露的机密文件、对特定空袭展开详尽核实,以及通过更广泛的未出镜机密消息人士进行交叉印证。
Produced by The Guardian, the investigative project builds upon findings initially published between 2023 and 2025 by the Israeli-Palestinian publication +972 Magazine, Hebrew-language outlet Local Call, and The Guardian itself. A Guardian spokesperson stated that the team behind the film interviewed more than 100 sources familiar with Israeli military systems used during the war in Gaza over the past three years, including senior commanders directly involved in strike authorizations. The rigorous verification protocol incorporated leaked classified documents, detailed scrutiny of specific military strikes, and extensive corroboration with off-camera confidential journalistic sources.
03以官方指控、民间施压与军法层面的法律评估Official Backlash, Public Pressure, and Military Legal Assessment
在以色列国内,政府官员对纪录片创作者发起了猛烈抨击。官方指控亚伯拉罕与索尔犯有叛国罪,并威胁剥夺两人的以色列国籍。政府支持者发誓将在导演返国时进行围堵纠缠,部分示威者聚集在索尔父母位于萨维永的住所外抗议,现场高喊针对叛徒判处死刑的口号。
Within Israel, government officials mounted aggressive attacks against the documentary filmmakers, accusing Abraham and Szor of treason and threatening to strip them of their Israeli citizenship. Government supporters pledged to hound the directors upon their return to the country, with demonstrators picketing Szor's parents' home in Savyon while chanting slogans demanding death sentences for traitors.
军方高层同样对该片展开抨击。以军总参谋长扎米尔将该片描述为对以色列国家的攻击,指责其散布谎言与血腥诽谤,并指示军方和法律官员核查出镜士兵身份以评估法律追责。然而,以色列军法署署长伊泰·奥菲尔对此提出明确的法律门槛,指出提起刑事起诉需要掌握违反安全规定或泄露机密材料的实质证据,不过行政或纪律处分手段仍在此类违规的处理考量之中。
The military command also sharply criticized the production. IDF Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir denounced the documentary as an attack on the State of Israel, accusing it of spreading lies and blood libels after ordering military and legal personnel to examine punitive options against featured soldiers. However, Military Advocate General Itai Ofir outlined strict legal thresholds for such action, clarifying that criminal prosecution would require concrete evidence showing security violations or the unauthorized disclosure of classified materials, though internal disciplinary measures remained open as an alternative.
04新闻界与电影界的抗议声援及官方公关应对Press and Cinema Industry Pushback Alongside Official Counter-Campaign
代表超过32万名新闻工作者的欧洲记者联合会秘书长里卡多·古铁雷斯发表声明,谴责以色列政府的威胁是对严格按照职业道德和公共利益履职的记者的公然恐吓,称这一举动旨在掩盖其罪行与加沙行动。《卫报》发言人同样表示,在威胁剥夺导演国籍之后,以色列政府要求追查调查消息源的做法,完全是为了转移外界对该片所揭示的加沙巴勒斯坦平民大规模伤亡紧迫问题的关注,强调记者有权在不受威胁与骚扰的情况下开展符合公众利益的调查。
Ricardo Gutiérrez, general secretary of the European Federation of Journalists, which represents more than 320,000 media workers, condemned the Israeli government's threats as blatant intimidation against reporters operating in strict accordance with ethical standards and the public interest. A spokesperson for The Guardian echoed those concerns, stating that following threats to revoke the citizenship of the filmmakers, the demand to investigate journalistic sources represents an effort to deflect attention from pressing questions raised by the film regarding mass killings of Palestinian civilians in Gaza, adding that reporters must remain free to pursue public-interest investigations without harassment.
在电影业界,包括洛迦诺电影节负责人在内的国际电影界权威人士公开声援亚伯拉罕与索尔,表示坚决支持电影人免于报复地涉足艰难与紧迫主题的权利。与此对应,以色列政府连日来在网络上推广一部模仿《NAZA》风格的反制影片项目以试图质疑其结论;这部名为《NAZA:真实故事》的影片由以色列律师兼军队预备役军人阿里尔·阿维尔布赫制作,他将该片定性为旨在转移国际社会对以军杀害平民指控关注的进攻性行动。
Prominent international cinema figures, including leadership from the Locarno Film Festival, voiced solidarity with Abraham and Szor, stating they firmly back the right of filmmakers to confront urgent and challenging subjects without fear of retaliation. In response to the documentary, the Israeli government promoted an online project titled NAZA: The Real Story that mimics the documentary's visual presentation to dispute its revelations. Ariel Averbuch, the Israeli attorney and army reservist behind the counter-production, described the release as an offensive move explicitly designed to shift international focus away from allegations surrounding civilian casualties in Gaza.


