查尔斯三世发函重申哈里梅根非在职王室身份King Charles Formally Clarifies Harry and Meghan Remain Non-Working Royals

王室内务最高官员宫务大臣代表国王查尔斯三世，向哈里王子的团队、政府各部门、军方官员以及各地的国王个人代表事务官分发了这份正式信函。信件详细陈述，众所周知萨塞克斯公爵与公爵夫人早在2020年1月便已放弃代表君主履行代表职责，不再属于王室在职成员。国王指示共享这些信息，其核心目的在于消除公私界限上的疑问并避免外界产生混淆。

Sent on behalf of King Charles III by the Lord Chamberlain, the most senior official in the Royal Household, the formal communication was distributed directly to Prince Harry's team, government departments, military leaders, and lord lieutenants across the country. The text explained that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex stepped down from undertaking representative duties on behalf of the Sovereign in January 2020 and are no longer working members of the Royal Family. The King directed that this information be formally shared to help avoid doubt or confusion among state and public institutions.

该信函进一步明确界定了两人的身份定位与行为规范，确认他们将继续不得使用“殿下”（His and Her Royal Highness）头衔。信件指出，两人的慈善工作完全属于个人事务并以私人身份开展，其实际处境类似于拥有商业和慈善利益的普通公民。信中同时指出，日常行动安保决策归属相关警务机构负责，官方机构若涉及应向两人提供的礼遇或需要动用公共资金的具体问题，必须直接向白金汉宫请示。

The letter firmly detailed the couple's ongoing restrictions, confirming they will continue to refrain from using their "His and Her Royal Highness" titles. Describing their standing as akin to private citizens with commercial and charitable interests, the communication emphasized that any charity work they undertake remains a purely personal matter carried out strictly in a private capacity. It also noted that operational security decisions belong to relevant police agencies, while directing that any official questions regarding courtesies or public funding must be submitted directly to Buckingham Palace.

在王室内务部门向多方机构下发信函后，哈里王子与梅根方面对相关通知流程提出了不同说法。萨塞克斯公爵与公爵夫人的发言人公开表示，两人对王室部门发出这封明确其非在职地位的信件感到惊讶，并指出他们此前并未获得提前告知。

Following the distribution of the Palace communication to official bodies, Prince Harry and Meghan presented a contrasting account regarding the notification process. A spokesperson for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex stated that the pair were surprised to see the Royal Household issue a letter clarifying their status as non-working royals, specifically emphasizing that they were caught off guard by the absence of advance consultation.

王室内部消息人士则给出了相互矛盾的陈述。王室方面消息人士明确坚称，哈里与梅根在信函内容向外界完全公开发布之前，就已经被告知了信件的存在及其核心信息。王室消息人士同时表示，出于透明度考量，王室选择主动公开信函，而不是任由其在日后通过渠道泄露。

Royal sources offered a conflicting version of events, maintaining that Prince Harry and Meghan were made aware of the letter before it was formally made public. Palace sources also suggested that making the communication public was intended to uphold transparency, rather than risking the text emerging later through unofficial leaks.

在加利福尼亚州生活六年之后，哈里王子与梅根携儿子阿奇和女儿莉莉贝特于上月返回英国，并预计定居在伦敦以西约两小时车程的科茨沃尔德地区。两人当年脱离王室职责并移居美国的决定曾引发王室内部关系的高度紧张，而本次全家迁回英国居住，促使王室内务部门通过书面形式重新确认其法律与体制界限。

Following six years of living in California, Prince Harry and Meghan returned to the United Kingdom last month with their two children, Archie and Lilibet, and are expected to reside in the Cotswolds region, roughly a two-hour drive west of London. The couple's initial departure from royal life to the United States had fueled significant tension among members of the royal family, making their recent return with their young family the direct catalyst for Buckingham Palace to reaffirm their official standing.

查尔斯三世在信件中强调，萨塞克斯公爵夫妇在2020年离开英国时达成的桑德灵厄姆协议依然完全有效。该协议明确排除了“半进半出”的折中模式，规定两人不能在保留在职王室成员身份的同时经营商业利益。王室观察人士认为，公开该信件反映了王室方面的考量，即避免两人的特殊地位演变为与在职王室成员相竞争的平行机构。

The King's communication emphasized that the terms established in the 2020 Sandringham Agreement when the couple stepped away remain fully in place. That foundational arrangement explicitly ruled out any hybrid "half-in and half-out" model, preventing Harry and Meghan from pursuing independent commercial ventures while continuing to serve as working royals. Observers noted that circulating and publishing the guidance addressed concerns that the couple's return could inadvertently foster a parallel royal court operating alongside working members of the monarchy.

安保安排属于哈里王子与英国政府之间长期争议的核心议题。在哈里与梅根放弃王室在职角色后，英国政府取消了全天候由纳税人资助的警方保护，哈里随后就访英期间安保级别被降级的决定发起法律诉讼，并在2024年败诉。随着全家重新返回英国定居，负责王室及政要安保事务的内政部专门委员会RAVEC召开会议，专门评估为该家庭恢复提供公共资金资助安保的可能性。

Security arrangements remain among the most contested matters surrounding Prince Harry's relationship with British authorities following his departure from official royal life. After the couple stepped back from royal duties, the government canceled their round-the-clock, publicly funded police protection. Harry subsequently launched a legal challenge against the official decision to downgrade his security detail during visits to the country, which he lost in 2024. With the family now residing in the United Kingdom once again, the Home Office security panel known as the Royal and VIP Executive Committee, or RAVEC, convened to review the possibility of providing taxpayer-funded police protection.

宫务大臣在信函中针对官方机构的资金与礼遇请求作出了明确规定。信件指出，日常行动安保决策归属相关警务机构负责，但任何来自官方和国家机构关于应当向公爵与公爵夫人提供何种礼遇的具体问题，尤其是需要动用公共资金的情况，均必须直接提交白金汉宫进行统筹审查与处理。

The Lord Chamberlain's letter also outlined strict protocols for state institutions dealing with public expenditure. While operational security decisions remain under the jurisdiction of relevant police authorities, the directive instructed that any specific inquiries from official bodies concerning courtesies extended to the couple, particularly whenever recourse to public funds is required, must be directed straight to Buckingham Palace for official consideration.