特朗普前律师约翰·伊斯特曼因试图推翻2020年大选结果被加州取消律师资格Former Trump Lawyer John Eastman Disbarred Over 2020 Election Overturn Efforts

加州最高法院的这一决定是基于对伊斯特曼职业行为的深度审查。法院支持了州律师法院的结论，即伊斯特曼在试图推翻选举结果的过程中，违背了其作为律师应当遵守的诚信和道德义务。法院的文件指出，伊斯特曼不仅参与了策略的制定，还积极推动了这些在法律上站不住脚的方案，试图以此改变合法的选举结果。

The California Supreme Court's decision stems from a comprehensive review of Eastman's professional conduct. The court upheld the State Bar Court's conclusion that Eastman breached his ethical and moral obligations as an attorney during his attempts to overturn the election results. Court filings indicate that Eastman did not merely provide legal advice but actively promoted legally unsound strategies intended to subvert the legitimate outcome of the vote.

针对加州最高法院的裁决，伊斯特曼的法律团队迅速作出了回应，表示将继续进行法律抗争。伊斯特曼的律师兰德尔·A·米勒（Randall A. Miller）在一份声明中明确表示，他们计划向美国最高法院寻求对此案的审查。米勒认为，取消伊斯特曼的律师资格本身就是对法治的威胁，并表示他们将致力于“否定”这一裁决。

In response to the California Supreme Court's ruling, Eastman's legal team signaled their intent to continue the legal battle. His attorney, Randall A. Miller, issued a statement confirming plans to seek a review of the case before the U.S. Supreme Court. Miller characterized the disbarment as a threat to the rule of law itself and stated that they would work to 'repudiate' the decision through further judicial review.

约翰·伊斯特曼曾担任法学院院长，在2020年大选后的法律争议中扮演了关键角色。他最为人所知的是起草了一份备忘录，建议当时的副总统迈克·彭斯可以在1月6日的国会联席会议上单方面拒绝某些州的选举人票，或者推迟认证程序。这一策略被广泛认为是缺乏法律依据的，并最终导致了针对他的职业道德调查和此次的取消资格裁决。

John Eastman, a former law school dean, played a pivotal role in the legal challenges following the 2020 election. He is most notable for drafting a memorandum suggesting that then-Vice President Mike Pence could unilaterally reject electors from certain states or delay the certification process during the January 6 joint session of Congress. This strategy was widely criticized as lacking legal merit and ultimately led to the ethics investigation and subsequent disbarment.