埃尔-萨耶德与罗杰斯举行密歇根州参议员终场辩论El-Sayed and Rogers Clash in Final Michigan Senate Debate

底特律举行的这场一小时终场辩论是埃尔-萨耶德与罗杰斯在11月3日中期选举前的最后一次正面对决。双方在数周前曾进行过一次火药味更浓的首轮辩论，而本场交锋虽然气氛相对收敛，但依然充满激烈的言辞交锋与个人攻击。民调显示接替加里·彼得斯席位的竞选极度胶着，使密歇根州成为左右全国参议院力量平衡的焦点选区之一。

The one-hour face-off in Detroit served as the closing debate between El-Sayed and Rogers ahead of the November 3 midterm elections, following an explosive earlier confrontation this month. While observers described Wednesday's exchange as more restrained than their first meeting, sharp personal clashes and policy disagreements remained central throughout the event. With public polling tracking a tight battle to succeed retiring Senator Gary Peters, the open seat stands out as an essential contest for the national balance of power in Washington.

目前参议院100个席位中共和党控制53席，民主党拥有45席并联合两名独立参议员。除参议院主导权归属外，本场角逐还被视为民主党进步派在关键摇摆州面临的重要检验。埃尔-萨耶德获得了包括参议员伯尼·桑德斯和众议员亚历山德里娅·奥卡西奥-科尔特斯在内的进步派政治人物支持，主张全民医保、对富人加税、停止对以色列的军事援助以及废除移民和海关执法局，而罗杰斯则持续将其定性为隐藏真实立场的极端进步派。

Republicans hold a 53-to-47 governing edge in the 100-member upper chamber when counting the 45 Democrats and two allied independents. Beyond determining party control, the Michigan race has emerged as a high-profile test of progressive strength in a premier swing state. El-Sayed, backed by progressive leaders including Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, is running on a platform that embraces Medicare for All, higher taxes on wealthy individuals, ending United States military aid to Israel, and abolishing ICE, while Rogers has countered by portraying his opponent as an ideological extremist seeking to soften his past record.

在辩论过程中，唐纳德·特朗普成为双方争论的核心焦点。埃尔-萨耶德在辩论舞台上18次点名特朗普，将罗杰斯形容为这位前总统的“套线木偶”，指控共和党对手只是在机械照搬特朗普阵营的话术。每当罗杰斯指责其支持社会主义政策、开放边境或削减警察经费时，埃尔-萨耶德便当场高呼“MAGA宾果”，以此嘲讽对手完全依赖特朗普式的选战口径，并批评罗杰斯是依附于特殊利益的政客。

President Donald Trump took center stage throughout the face-off, serving as the central target for Democratic nominee Abdul El-Sayed's offensive against Mike Rogers. El-Sayed named Trump 18 times during the one-hour broadcast, branding the Republican former congressman as Trump's "sock puppet" and accusing him of merely reciting talking points dictated by the former president. Whenever Rogers attacked him over progressive stances such as socialist economic policies, open borders, and cutting law enforcement budgets, El-Sayed repeatedly called out "MAGA bingo" to paint his opponent as an uncritical follower of Trump's national agenda.

面对民主党对手密集的言语攻势，罗杰斯公开反唇相讥，表示真正的宾果游戏应当是清点埃尔-萨耶德在发言中究竟塞进了多少次特朗普的名字。罗杰斯指责对方的攻击荒谬可笑，反驳埃尔-萨耶德试图将一切辩题都强行引向特朗普，以此掩盖其自身的极端政治倾向与欺骗模式。双方围绕效忠特朗普的交锋贯穿整场辩论，成为两人在各自政治定位上相互攻讦的重要标志。

Rogers pushed back against the repeated barbs, ridiculing the tactic by proposing that viewers play an entirely different game. Pointing to his opponent's relentless references to the former president, Rogers argued that the real bingo game ought to be counting how many times El-Sayed managed to insert Trump's name into his answers over thirty minutes, calling the performance ridiculous. Rogers maintained that El-Sayed relied on personal attacks and distraction tactics to deflect scrutiny from his own platform and what Rogers described as a recurring pattern of political deception.

在经济与贸易议题上，罗杰斯公开展示了自己与特朗普的不同见解，将特朗普推行的全面关税措施评价为“利弊参半”。罗杰斯指出，自己支持采取举措将汽车制造业从中国和墨西哥带回密歇根州，但他明确质疑针对加拿大加征关税的做法，称考虑到两国汽车产业链之间极为紧密的联结，对加拿大实施关税可能欠缺深思熟虑。密歇根州毗邻美加边界，并且是全美汽车制造业岗位数量最多的州，罗杰斯表示只要对密歇根州有利他就支持，不利便会反对。

Turning to trade and economic policy, Rogers established clear distance from Trump by characterizing the president's tariffs as a "mixed bag." Rogers stated that while he supported steps to bring automotive manufacturing back to Michigan from China and Mexico, he directly questioned the impact of tariffs imposed on Canada. Referencing the deeply integrated automotive supply chains connecting the two neighbors across the border, Rogers said Canadian tariffs may have been "not well thought through." He pledged to prioritize local economic needs, stating that he would back policies beneficial to Michigan and oppose measures harmful to the state, which holds more car manufacturing jobs than any other U.S. state.

除了对加拿大关税提出异议，罗杰斯还在辩论现场呼吁国会立法，明确禁止中国汽车制造商在美国境内建厂生产汽车。埃尔-萨耶德随即针对该表态发起反击，指出特朗普此前曾公开表示对中国汽车企业赴美建厂持开放态度。埃尔-萨耶德当场质疑罗杰斯是否真敢在国会挺身反抗特朗普，批评其切割姿态缺乏实质行动支撑。

Rogers also proposed that Congress step in to ban Chinese automakers from manufacturing vehicles on American soil. El-Sayed quickly seized on that proposal, noting that Trump had previously expressed openness to allowing Chinese car companies to build vehicles inside the United States. Challenging Rogers's claim of independence from the White House, El-Sayed openly questioned whether his Republican rival would actually stand up to Trump when legislative decisions and presidential preferences collide on Capitol Hill.

在涉及外交政策与生活成本的辩论环节，埃尔-萨耶德将美国国内汽油和食品价格上涨直接归咎于对伊朗的军事冲突，并指责罗杰斯全面支持这场被他称为“漫无目的”的战争。埃尔-萨耶德呼吁国会通过战争权力决议来追究特朗普发动冲突的责任，而不是选出一名与特朗普步调一致的参议员。他还提及前总统贝拉克·奥巴马任内签署的2015年《联合全面行动计划》，认为该协议通过限制铀浓缩与接受国际核查成功遏制了伊朗威胁，批评特朗普2018年单方面退约导致局势恶化。

Turning to foreign policy and household living costs, Abdul El-Sayed directly linked rising domestic gasoline and grocery prices to the ongoing military conflict with Iran, accusing Mike Rogers of standing shoulder to shoulder with Donald Trump in backing what he described as an aimless war. El-Sayed argued that Congress urgently needs to pass a war powers resolution to hold the president accountable rather than electing a senator who marches in lockstep with the White House. He also defended the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action reached under President Barack Obama, arguing that diplomatic caps on uranium enrichment and international inspections successfully contained Iranian capabilities before Trump unilaterally pulled out of the agreement in 2018.

罗杰斯对埃尔-萨耶德的外交立场展开猛烈反击，重申了首轮辩论中的质疑，指出埃尔-萨耶德拒绝谴责作为伊朗恐怖执法工具的伊斯兰革命卫队，且未认定伊朗比以色列更具威胁。罗杰斯为其支持特朗普最初打击伊朗核计划的行动辩护，称发起打击存在正当理由，尽管他近期推出竞选广告呼吁平息冲突，并在受访时否认特朗普开战属于犯错。他反指埃尔-萨耶德的立场是“绝对行不通的”，指责其在国家安全核心原则上存在严重判断偏差。

Rogers aggressively pushed back against his opponent's national security framework, seizing on El-Sayed's refusal during their first debate to answer whether Israel or Iran posed a greater threat to the United States. Rogers emphasized that El-Sayed had failed to condemn the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, which he characterized as Iran's terrorist enforcement arm, calling such hesitation an absolute nonstarter for a potential senator. Defending his own stance, Rogers maintained that Trump had sound reason to target Iran's nuclear infrastructure initially, though he noted cutting a campaign advertisement calling for the conflict to wind down while insisting in an interview that the initial military action was not a mistake.

在辩论涉及国内执法与个人诚信的交锋中，罗杰斯指责埃尔-萨耶德删除了过去有关“削减警察经费”的社交媒体内容，涵盖相关视频、播客与评论。罗杰斯将削警立场定性为乔治·弗洛伊德事件后部分左翼民主党人推动的主张，质问埃尔-萨耶德为何耗费时间清理这些记录，并以此声称其政治立场前后矛盾、刻意向选民隐瞒过往记录。

During clashes over law enforcement policy and candidate credibility, Mike Rogers accused Abdul El-Sayed of systematically scrubbing past social media content calling for defunding the police. Pointing to progressive policy demands that gained traction among far-left Democrats following the death of George Floyd in 2020, Rogers challenged his opponent on why he took the time to erase past videos, podcasts, and comments from online platforms, asserting that the deletions reflected an attempt to conceal his underlying positions from voters.

罗杰斯随后将指控延伸至海外关联，公开指称埃尔-萨耶德曾要求埃及穆斯林兄弟会前总统穆尔西在当地削减警察经费，并指控其家庭与该组织存在关联，声称埃尔-萨耶德在个人履历与相关联结上误导公众。埃尔-萨耶德当场坚决否认曾加入穆斯林兄弟会，指出对手反复挑起这一指控完全是因为其母亲法腾·埃尔科米在密苏里州担任护士，其母曾任职的慈善机构虽在关闭后被美方列入支持恐怖组织名单，但其母从未被控任何违法行为。

Rogers amplified the attack by questioning El-Sayed's international connections, claiming onstage that El-Sayed had asked former Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi, who was affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood, to defund the police in Egypt as well. Rogers repeatedly cited alleged family connections to the Islamist organization to challenge his opponent's trustworthiness. El-Sayed firmly denied ever belonging to the Muslim Brotherhood, replying that Rogers continually revived the accusation solely because of his mother, Fatten Elkomy, who works as a nurse in Missouri and had worked for a charity later shuttered over government terror-support designations, though she was never accused of any wrongdoing.